Moving from Jaraads.com to this site

This blog will be a continuation of Jaraads.com.
All posts from jaraads.com will be transferred to this site soon.


Three failed approaches to change the mindset of people

Changing the mindset of people about something they already have an opinion about is not easy; it takes lots of money and time. Even for some businesses their well studied advertisements do not help when they try to promote something new. In many cases, change might be almost impossible. Here are three different approaches to change the mindset of people. Unfortunately, none of these ways achieved its purpose.

I Promotion:

When Coca Cola reentered the Middle East back in the early 90s*, a story circulated among Jordanians. Coca Cola Jordan office wanted to promote their red product so they went to crowded neighborhoods and held very big events that included bands singing, giving prizes and what not. The Coca Cola press reporter was on the scene in one of these events interviewing people. He stopped a young man and asked him what he thinks about the event. The man answered “It is a lovely event. Some people came to our neighborhood, gave us red T-shirts, red bags, and even some people won red cars and we drank lots of Pepsi for free.”

II Time

I heard this story from my father. Back in the days in Jordan, there was no running water in villages. Mothers and daughters used to fetch water from a nearby well, lake or spring. Some boys used to go there as well to flirt with girls. One day, a teenage boy accidently farted in front of all the women. Everyone has heard the fart and started laughing at the young man. Since then the well was nicknamed Abu Thrat’s Well. The well took the new nickname of the boy which is ‘Farty.’ The young man felt ashamed of his new nickname and decided to travel away. Twenty years later he came back to his home town. He was so excited and happy to see his old village until he overheard a kid shouting to his peers “let’s go play near that old Abu thrat’s well.”

III Money

The Arabian Gulf countries especially Saudi Arabia and UAE spent billions of dollars to make their countries known not as just rich desert oil countries but as world leaders in tallest towers and luxurious hotels. Dubai and Abu Dhabi are competing against each others to become the Singapore of the business district and the Monaco of tourism (without the gambling) in the Middle East.

One very important reason the Arab Gulf countries are so adamant to prove themselves in any way is because they want to change the mindset of non-Arabs. Only the Arab countries refer to the gulf between the Arab Gulf countries and Iran as the Arabian Gulf. The rest of the worlds call it the Persian Gulf.

If you read the caption on the picture below you will see what I mean.

IMG_0289 IMG_0290
 No matter how much is being spent the world still calls it the Persian Gulf. [Click on picture to enlarge]

So, the question is why it is almost impossible to change the perception of people about an issue they already have an opinion about?

Do you know other stories in which people wouldn’t change their mindset or perception about something?

*”The Arab League boycotted Coca-Cola from August 1968 to May 1991, as part of the economic boycott of Israel.” [Source]


How to correct a ‘Serial Error-Prone’?

Last week, our Computer Science Department hosted a guest speaker. The speaker is a Chief Cyber Security at one of the biggest laboratories in the nation.  His presentation was very interesting and useful. He told us a funny story that I am going to share with you. But it is not the story itself that I find worth sharing it is what he said at the end of the story.

So, one of the employees received an email with a web address, also known as a URL link. After he clicked on the link the institute ended up being off the grid for two weeks. They had to go off line because of the sensitivity of the research this big national institute is working on.

After two weeks of hard work making sure their data and network is secure they went online again. Of course before going online all employees were told not to click on URL links because it may be linked to a malware (malicious code). For extra security they edited URL addresses received via email by replacing “tt” with “xx” in http. So, when someone clicks on “hxxp://CNN.com” it will show a broken link.

The speaker told us that new employees are trained about safety of using the internet and emails and how they should be cautious about email attachments and clicking on URL links. So, it was funny when he told us that the same person who caused the two weeks shut down of the internet in their organization did it again. The same person, received an email with a URL but since clicking on the link doesn’t work he copied the address and changed the “xx” to “tt”. Viola! Smart huh?

The audience laughed when the speaker called the person “Serial Clicker.” He said “we train our employees and send emails about not clicking on URL links but some people out there are serial clicker.”

I doubt the story is fully true but I think it might be based on an incident that happened in this organization or another institution. Regardless, I have to commend on our speaker’s ability not to make his audience bored.

Anyway, here is what he said that made me thinking. He said “I don’t think the ‘serial clicker’ is only to blame. We train people we tell them not to click on the links but they still do. There has to be something wrong with our training. Everyone knows that if you do the same thing you will get the same result.”

I find Americans, or to be more accurate,  I find some Americans to be very mature when it comes to admitting wrong doing or thinking out of the box. I might be wrong but in the short period I worked in Jordan I can’t say that I can imagine a Jordanian boss would say something similar to the quote above. The boss shares the blame even when he knows that the employee is very wrong.

One might say they should fire this stupid employee. If this story is true as it is told I am sure they did. But this speaker is thinking ahead. He knows they will always be people who will make the same mistake again and again even after one shows them the correct way to do it many times.

As a teacher I can relate to this. Many times, I find few students in my class repeat the same mistake again and again no matter how many times I say not to. People think and analyze differently so we have to be more creative in the way we teach or approach a dead end in a discussion.

So, the next time you find someone repeats the same mistake again and again and you do care about him maybe it is time for you to think of another approach or way to correct his behavior. According to the author of “buy.ology” warning labels on cigarette packs have no effect on suppressing the number of smokers.

“Warning labels on the sides, fronts, and backs of cigarette packs had no effect on suppressing the smokers’ cravings at all. Zero. In other words, all those gruesome photographs, government regulations, billions of dollars some 123 countries had invested in nonsmoking campaigns, all amounted, at the end of a day, to, well, a big waste of money.”  [NPR]

There are so many examples of the ineffective warning labels on cigarette packs. A very critical one is the way we try to solve the Arab World problems. We forgot the principle rule “if you do what you have always done you will get what you have always gotten.”  It is time to change but it should be done wisely.